APPROVED MINUTES

BROOKFIELD ZONING COMMISSION

Thursday, August 26, 2010 – 7:00 p.m.

MEETING ROOM #133 – TOWN HALL, 100 POCONO ROAD

1.                  Convene Meeting

Present:    Chairman S. Parker, F. Weisman, W. Mercer, Secretary C. Lynch, Alternate and Voting Member R. Amorossi, Alternate M. Grimes (left the meeting at 8:00 p.m.)

Absent:      Vice Chairman R. Blessey, Alternate F. Lollie

Also Present:  Zoning Enforcement Officer W. Schappert

 

Item 1.a., Review Minutes of Previous Meetings:  8/12/10 – Commissioner Amorossi noted the following correction:  On Page 1, Item 1.a., that the motion carried, 3-0-2, and delete that Commissioner Lollie abstained, as he did not vote.  Additionally, on Page 5, Item 6.b., 11 Red Barn Lane, in the second paragraph, 14th line, to change the sentence, “There was discussion regarding allowing the applicant to notify the neighbors, and then certifying that he/she has done so.”, to, “Commissioner Mercer suggested allowing the applicant to notify the neighbors, and then certifying that he/she has done so.”  Commissioner Weisman moved to approve the Minutes of the August 12, 2010 meeting with the two aforementioned corrections.  Commissioner Grimes seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.  

 

 2.    Land Use Enforcement

a.       Enforcement Officer’s Report:

ZEO Schappert advised the Commission that Ms. Alice Dew will be taking over as the full-time ZEO, commencing at the next meeting. 

 

14 Knollcrest Dr. ZEO Schappert explained that this complaint relates to calls from several neighbors regarding “junk” in two unregistered vehicles.  The Cease and Desist was sent, and receipt was received back yesterday.  Photographs were taken and will be reviewed.

 

9 Stoney Farm LaneComplaints from neighbors continue to occur; related to the appearance of commercial activity on property.  Additionally, the property owner, Mr. Moss, has not begun the relocation of shed yet.  He has a building permit to do so, and six months to complete the work.  There are also vehicles on the site that, per the regulations, are commercial vehicles, but Mr. Moss alleges they are his own personal vehicles.   Upon inquiry by Commissioner Grimes, ZEO Schappert advised that Mr. Moss is no longer represented by Attorney Marcus.  The property owner has ten days to schedule hearing before the Zoning Commission, or the enforcement will go to a citation.  The neighbors continue to file complaints.

 

16 Elbow Hill Rd. – The debris, except for a small pile of blacktop, has been removed.  The blacktop should be taken by a neighbor in a week.    

 

Secretary Lynch inquired regarding the status of 48 Old Middle Road.  ZEO Schappert stated he visited the site and found the material to be from internal construction.  There is an old lawn mower and material under a blue tarp.  Secretary Lynch stated that these items have appeared to be present for a long time, and alleged it is debris and not construction material.  ZEO Schappert indicated that he sent another letter today requesting that the property owner complete the work.  He will ask new ZEO Dew to provide an update at the next meeting.

 

Town Counsel Action

ZEO Schappert has indicated he has requested information from the Town Attorney regarding the items referred to his office.  Chairman Parker advised that he spoke with Attorney Marcus, and he is “working on it”. 

 

1 Woodcreek Rd. – This property is now owned by the bank.  It is not clear where or to whom correspondence should be sent.  Commissioner Grimes moved to request a report from Town Counsel on all zoning actions.  Commissioner Amorossi seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.

 

1 High Ridge Rd. – ZEO Schappert referenced a letter from the property owner, and then reviewed a draft of his reply, which included documentation of the violations at the site.  With regard to the complaints against the neighbor, Mr. Harrison; that property owner has applied for and was granted a shed permit.  Additionally, ZEO Schappert investigated the complaint regarding the recreational vehicle last year, and found no violation; and determined that the garage is pre-existing and non-conforming.  ZEO Schappert also noted that upon inspection, he found the light to be present on Mr. Zakey’s property and pointing directly at the neighbor’s property.  The allegations contained in the Citation will be reinstated.  ZEO Schappert indicated he would send the draft of his letter to Mr. Zakey unless there were objections from the Commission.

 

782 Federal Rd. – ZEO Schappert read his memo dated 8/22/10 related to this matter.  It reviewed the history and recent timeline of activity related to this application.  The memo included a summary of ZEO Schappert’s opinion and evidence related to an approval he felt was “flawed” and did not approve a use for the site.  It concludes with a request for the Commission to rescind the approval.  Commissioner Amorossi indicated that he felt ZEO Schappert “shaded some of the facts”, noting his understanding of the Fire Department’s decision as being related to the difficulty of getting to the back of building.  ZEO Schappert referenced the Fire Department’s letter.  Secretary Lynch stated he believed that ZEO Schappert “overstepped” his authority, that his memo shows a “personal vendetta against Baptista family” and that he attempted “to steer the Board”.   ZEO Schappert vehemently objected to these comments, and requested that they be withdrawn.  He stated that he was “concerned with the appearance of the Commission that they do their job and look at the regulations.”   Commissioner Grimes stated he felt Secretary Lynch’s comment was “way over the top”, and he believes that each member of the Commission evaluates applications by the regulations.  He noted that ZEO Schappert’s memo is advisory, and had he not provide his opinion, “he wouldn’t be doing his job.”   Commissioner Mercer stated that he felt that Secretary Lynch’s accusation is “without support”.  Secretary Lynch indicated that perhaps he should have only questioned ZEO Schappert’s motivation behind his memo, as the decision on the application was already made.   Commissioner Mercer stated that he felt the memo was only “an evaluation of the regulations” and was without personal animosity for the applicant.  He indicated that he felt that ZEO Schappert had the right to issue the memo “without being attacked”.   Commissioner Weisman had no comment. 

 

Howard Lasser, 116 Tower Rd., Ex Officio member and representative of the Board of Selectmen, was present.  He stated that his concern is that the ZEO has put forth a case that the Commission’s decision “would not pass judicial muster”.   He suggested that those who were in support of the decision should put together a record that substantiates the Commission’s decision.

 

Commissioner Weisman thanked ZEO Schappert for “his many years of diligent service with great compassion and much confidence”.   The Chairman also extended his thanks to ZEO Schappert, noting he would still be present in an advisory capacity for the Town.

 

Commissioner Grimes would like to review ZEO Schappert’s memo, and possibly refer it to Town Counsel given Selectmen Lasser’s comments.   This matter will be discussed again at the next meeting.

 

        3.   Review Correspondence & Project Status Reports

a.   Minutes of Other Boards & Commissions:  Inland Wetlands Commission 8/9/10, 8/23/10; Planning Commission 8/5/10, 8/19/10

b.   Iroquois Report:  August 2010 Issue

c.    E-mail from Ryan Dell to Bill Schappert dated 8/12/10 Re:  Goddard School Parking Lot Addition – Zoning Application

d.   Letter from Peter A. Scalzo to Attorney Peter S. Olson dated 8/18/10 Re:  782 Federal Road

e.    Letter from David A. Sawicki (State Traffic Commission) to Zoning Commission dated 8/19/10 Re:  Barnbeck Place

No discussion/no motions.

 

5.   Old Business :

Item 5.a.  763 Federal Road #201000616:  Site Plan Modification (dec date 9/25/10)

            1.  Memo from Christopher Van Zanten, P.E. (Howland & Assoc.) to Zoning Commission dated                        8/17/10 Re:  Site Plan, The Community’s Bank, 763 Federal Rd

            2. Letter from Christopher Van Zanten to Stanley Parker dated 8/16/10 Re:  Site Plan, The                                Community’s Bank, 763 Federal Rd.

            3.  Map titled “Illumination Plan” prepared by Arthur Howland & Assoc. dated 7/13/10 revised                         8/16/10 – sheet IL.1

            4.  Map cover sheet titled “Site Development Plan” prepared by Arthur Howland & Assoc. dated                      7/1/10 revised 8/16/10 – sheet SD.1

·         Landscaping Plan” dated 7/1/10 revised 8/16/10 – sheet LA.1

·         Vehicle Turning Template Diagrams” dated 7/1/10 revised 8/16/10 – sheet TT.1

·         Proposed Sedimentation & Erosion Control Plan” dated 7/1/10 – sheet SES.1

·         Standard Detail” dated 7/1/10 – sheet D.1

Standard Detail” dated 7/1/10 revised 8/16/10 – sheet D.2

C. Van Zanten, Registered Architect, was present.  He reviewed his memo that discusses changes to the plans.  Secretary Lynch inquired regarding the change in siding material.  Chairman Parker explained that the original approval was for Hardy Plank material.  When the building was constructed, it was noted that the contractor ignored this specification, and installed vinyl siding.  Chairman Parker and Secretary Lynch indicated they found this material (vinyl) to be satisfactory in appearance.  Commissioner Amorossi moved to approve the application for 763 Federal Rd., Site Plan Modification, #201000616, and to issue a waiver allowing for the vinyl that exists on the building with the approval of the Zoning Commission.  ZEO Schappert noted that the State Department of Transportation has the final say on the entrance way and sidewalks, as they both sit on State property.  The Chairman advised the applicant that if the State turns down the proposal, the applicant will have to return to the Commission.  Secretary Lynch seconded the motion.  Commissioner Weisman asked for the motion to be repeated, and the Chairman read it back.  Secretary Lynch stated that he did not believe that the additional handicapped parking space was not necessary.  He indicated that he believed it took away from the building, and the building is already compliant with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  Chairman Parker disagreed.  Secretary Lynch stated that more parking is better for the district and reiterated that it meets the federal regulations. 

 

Commissioner Amorossi moved to amend the original motion to allow the required one handicapped parking space as indicated on the previous plans.  Secretary Lynch seconded the motion.  Motion carried 4-1, with Chairman Parker opposing.

 

The vote on the above motion to approve with the waiver for vinyl carried unanimously, 5-0.

 

The applicant was requested to provide revised plans showing the one handicapped parking space. 

 

Item 5.b., Proposed Regulation Amendment:  Add a new subsection to 242-501, Commercial and Industrial Districts  - Please leave this item on the agenda for the next meeting and supply the Commission members with a copy of the draft for their review.

  

Item 5. c.,Proposed Regulation Change – Section 242-404D – Incentive Housing (PH scheduled for 9/16/10)

                        1.         Draft dated 8/18/10 – Commissioner Grimes pointed out the public hearing was incorrectly reported in the newspaper as being tonight, when it will actually occur on September 16, 2010.   Commissioner Mercer stated he had grammatical corrections, and noted that under Section 12, Architectural Guidelines – under “facades”, Item 1, there are two blank lines.  He inquired what information was to be listed in that section.  ZEO Schappert indicated that the draft was modeled after the Town of Wallingford, and will find out what information is missing.  Commissioner Weisman also suggested that on the top of the page, that instead of the term, “broken down”; that it is changed to “divided”.  The Chairman indicated that this change, and possible others, will be discussed at the public hearing. 

 

No motions.

               

6    New Business:

Item 6.a., 1055 Federal Road (Brookfield North LLC) #200501081:  Permit Extension for 5 years – There was discussion regarding whether this is the first request for an extension.  It was noted that the State Department of Transportation did not review this matter until the bypass was completed.  Commissioner Amorossi moved to approve the permit extension for five years for 1055 Federal Road, #200501081 to allow time for the applicant to get the State approvals for traffic in place.  Commissioner Grimes seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.

 

Item 6.b. 49 Federal Road #201000732:  Site Plan Modification to expand parking area from 38 spaces to 57                 spaces (dec date 10/30/10)

                  1.  Map titled “Site Plan For Parking Expansion” prepared by CCA, LLC dated 2/19/09 revised                            8/17/10 – sheet S1

·                      Landscape Plan for Parking Expansion” dated 2/19/09 – sheet L1 –

A. Adams, Registered Landscape Architect, CCA, 40 Old New Milford Rd., was present.  Commissioner Weisman requested clarification regarding the new parking spots, and Ms. Adams delineated their location pursuant to the Commission’s conclusion of the location as a sideyard at its last meeting.  Ms. Adams further stated that vegetation will be transplanted.  Commissioner Grimes moved to approve the Site Plan Modification for 49 Federal Rd., #201000732, per the map last revised 8/17/10.  Secretary Lynch seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.

Item 6.c., Proposed Regulation Change – Section 242-405 “Apartment Units within Single-Family    Dwellings (PH scheduled for 9/23/10)

             1.   Draft of Regulation Change – No discussion/no motions.

 

Item 6.d., 117 Old State Road (Fred Astaire Dance Hall) #201000737:  New business requesting approval for “use” to serve liquor. – Commissioner Grimes indicated this site has become a popular location as a rental for catered events.  Commissioner Grimes moved to approve 117 Old State Rd., #201000737.  Commissioner Amorossi seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.

  

Item 6.e., Appointment of Zoning Enforcement OfficerCommissioner Grimes made a point of order and indicated that he did not believe the Commission could act on this item until the Board of Selectmen do.  Selectmen Lasser indicated that the BOS does not act on it; only to refuse or rescind an appointment. 

Commissioner Amorossi moved to appoint A. Dew as Zoning Enforcement Officer until January 31, 2011.  Commissioner Mercer seconded the motion.   Motion carried unanimously,

 

Item 6.f., 887 Federal Road #200300284:  Request for application extension for two (2) years dated 8/17/10

             1.   Memo from Land Use office to Zoning Commission dated 8/18/10 Re:  Letter of Credit

W. Lavelle, 328 Federal Rd., Brookfield was present.  He is requesting a two-year extension.  Commissioner Amorossi inquired what the status of the letter of credit was.  Mr. Lavelle indicated that per Land Use Office staff, the renewal of the LOC is in the file.  Commissioner Amorossi moved to approve the extension for two years for 887 Federal Rd., #200300284 pending confirmation from Nina Mack, Land Use Secretary, that the extension of the letter of credit is in the file.  Commissioner Mercer seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.

 

Item 6.g., 22 Beech Tree Road #201000750:  Customary Home Occupation “Engraving” (dec date 10/30/10) – Chairman Parker noted that this application relates to an engraving business.  All work and sales will be done via the computer.  Commissioner Grimes moved to approve the Customary Home Occupation at 22 Beech Tree Rd., #201000750.  Commissioner Weisman seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. 

 

Item 6.h., Proposed Regulation Change #201000753:  Section 242-401A(2) – Customary Home Occupation

Commissioner Amorossi moved to set a Public Hearing for September 23, 2010.  He inquired why this authority is being shifted from the Commission to the ZEO.  The draft was reviewed.  Chairman Parker stated that the change relates to having the decision made by the Commission with certification that the applicant has notified his neighbors.  It was noted, however, after reviewing the draft further, that it does give authority to the ZEO.  Commissioner Grimes indicated he did not think it was a good idea.  Commissioner Amorossi stated that the discussion could occur at the Public Hearing.  Commissioner Weisman seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.   

 

Commissioner Grimes left the meeting at 8 p.m.

 

        4.  PUBLIC HEARING - 8:00 PM:

             a.   10 Whisconier Road #201000555:  Single Family Dwelling Conversion (PH close date 9/30/10) –

Chairman Parker opened the public hearing and introduced the Commission members.   Secretary Lynch read the legal notice that was published in the News Times on August 13 and August 23, 2010.  Chairman Parker then reviewed the policies and procedures that govern public hearings. 

 

Chairman Parker noted that there was no correspondence in the file related to the application.

 

N. Lavoie, 10 Whisconier Rd., was present.  She indicated that the house is presently for sale and she is attempting to put an apartment above the garage for her sister.   The application and the floor plan were reviewed and square footage was discussed. 

 

Commissioner Amorossi moved to approve 10 Whisconier Rd., #201000555, as presented.  Commissioner Weisman seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.  Commissioner Mercer made a point of order and noted that the Public Hearing needed to be closed first.

 

Mr. and Mrs. Renna, 12 Whisconier Rd., were present.   Mr. Renna discussed his concerns regarding parking, the garage, and septic.  Chairman Parker advised Mr. Renna that the property owner would have to go to the Town Sanitarian for approval.  Mr. Renna stated that he is concerned about the home and apartment’s occupation in the future when Ms. Lavoie sells the home.  He is also concerned that the Town does not send out registered letters for these types of applications.  Chairman Parker stated that a legal notice is published in the newspaper.   ZEO Schappert added that, per the regulations, the property owner and/or renter must qualify each year for elderly status and to verify that the site meets the regulations.

 

No one was present to speak in favor of the application, nor was anyone present to speak in opposition.

 

Commissioner Weisman moved to close the Public Hearing for 10 Whisconier Rd., #201000555, Single Family Dwelling Conversion.  Commissioner Mercer seconded the motion and it carried unanimously.

 

Commissioner Amorossi moved to approve the Single Family Dwelling Conversion for 10 Whisconier Rd., #201000555.  Commissioner Weisman seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.

470 Federal Road #201000610:  Design Review – Industrial Condo Building and Associates site                     improvements (PH close date 9/30/10)

Chairman Parker advised that the same introduction for this public hearing would be used.  There were no objections. 

 

A. Adams, Registered Landscape Architect, CCA, 40 Old New Milford Rd., was present, on behalf of the applicant.  She reviewed the location of the site, which sits in an IL80 zone.  She further stated that the site is 1.85 acres, and there are no wetlands on the property.  The proposed structure is an 18,500 square foot industrial condominium building.  Access will be at the southern end, from Federal Road.  The building is expected to be divided into six units, and parking will be adjacent to the building on the southern side, and along the northern property line.  Each unit will have an overhead door with trailer tractor loading.  There are no set tenants for any of the units at this time.  Ms. Adams then reviewed the building materials and color samples with the Commission.  She noted that for each unit, there is pedestrian access and sidewalks along the southern, northern and eastern sides for access into each unit, as necessary.  Ms. Adams indicated that surface drainage will be through catch basins that flow along the western side to front of building, where there is underground detention/recharge that will overflow to the Town system.  She stated that the building is proposed to be tied into the Town sewer, and that proposal is currently before the Water Pollution Control Authority.  The building will also be tied into the existing gas line on Federal Road, as well as the water main on Federal Road.  Ms. Adams noted that the building will have a sprinkler system, eliminating the need for a fire tank.  She then reviewed the front yard buffer plantings and the residential buffer strip required along the western side.

 

Secretary Lynch expressed his concern for what the proposed landscaping will look like in a few years.  He inquired if a berm was possible.  Ms. Adams indicated that the site does slope up four to five feet above the road.

 

Commissioner Amorossi requested clarification regarding the location of the site, and Ms. Adams indicated it is near the cemetery located on that portion of Federal Road.

 

Commissioner Weisman inquired if the building would be subdivided, and Ms. Adams described the six-unit configuration.  He further inquired if the fire marshal had any concerns regarding the single access to the site.  Ms. Adams stated that the plans have been submitted to the Water Source Committee, and no response has been received as of yet.

 

Secretary Lynch inquired if there was a security gate in the front.  Ms. Adams stated that none is being proposed.  He inquired if evergreens would be part of the landscaping, for screening purposes.  Ms. Adams reviewed the species proposed on the east side, and indicated that some of the shrubs are evergreens.  She will look at species that will survive at the site and that will provide year round screening. 

 

There were no questions of clarification from the audience.  No one was present to speak in favor of the application, nor was anyone present to speak in opposition.

 

Commissioner Amorossi moved to close the Public Hearing for 470 Federal Rd., #201000610, Design Review.  Secretary Lynch seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.

       

7.   Tabled Items            None.

 

8.   Informal Discussion:

Item 8.a.1., Definitions – section 242-202 and Table of Permitted Uses section 242-501; 1.Recommendations to clarify changes submitted by Bill Schappert – Note that the Draft Submitted by Mr. Schappert was dated 8/17/02

 

Commissioner Weisman suggested deleting the words, “but not” and changing it to “and”.  ZEO Schappert noted that there is only one definition, to eliminate the use of drive-throughs from the zone.  There was discussion regarding the majority of the Board being concerned regarding the presence of fast food restaurants, as opposed to drive-throughs.   Commissioner Weisman noted that the McDonald’s in Brookfield, three miles from the Four Corners area, does not have “golden arches”.  Chairman Parker recalled the Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission, when the Planimetrics’ representative noted that the McDonald’s in Freeport Maine is in a colonial style building.  Chairman Parker indicated he did not have a problem with fast food restaurants.  Secretary Lynch discussed the requirements that large chains have for brand recognition.

 

ZEO Schappert stated that his draft is based on past discussion and the vote of Commission and attempts to addresses the distinction between types of drive-throughs.  Secretary Lynch stated he did not believe that the last vote was a representation of the Commission’s view on drive-throughs.  ZEO Schappert stated that the last vote would not allow drive-throughs any place in Town.  Secretary Lynch inquired what would be necessary to rescind a motion made at the last meeting.  The Minutes from the last meeting were reviewed.  Commissioner Mercer noted that Vice Chairman Blessey participated in the first vote, but recused himself from the second vote as he is a business owner in the Town Center District.  There was additional discussion regarding the procedure for rescinding a motion.  There was discussion about whether or not last meeting’s vote represented the intent of the majority of the Commission to eliminate drive-throughs in Town or just in a particular zone.  Commissioner Amorossi stated that the Commission must accept that it is the choice of Town residents to have the convenience of having drive-through type facilities.   Commissioner Mercer inquired if he had read the Plan of Conservation and Development where it is reported that residents of Town wanted the Four Corners area to look different from the rest of Federal Road.  Commissioner Amorossi stated that he did not reference a “fast food restaurant”, as there is no definition of a “fast food restaurant”.  He stated that he said “fast food facility” and that it what he describes as Kentucky Fried Chicken.  Commissioner Mercer pointed out that the Commission is obligated by its by-laws to follow the POCD, and that is not what is taking place with recent action.  Commissioner Amorossi pointed out that the Commission is currently mandated to redraft that document.  Commissioner Mercer noted that until that is done, the Commission must live by the one in existence.  Commissioner Weisman pointed out that the preamble of the current document states that it is a “guide”, not an ordinance.  He stated that he believes that the residents that have the right to select the type of building that they want in that area.  Commissioner Mercer stated that he felt that additional curb cuts for drive-throughs are not conducive to the pedestrian friendly area. 

 

Commissioner Amorossi and Chairman Parker recalled the discussion with the Planimetrics professional at the Joint meeting with the Planning Commission.  Chairman Parker stated that the research indicates that if there are drive-throughs in a district, individuals will get their desired goods and leave; whereas in a district without drive-throughs, individuals will park and utilize more businesses and the area in general.  Secretary Lynch discussed the attractiveness of having a “premier address”; and indicated that Brookfield would not be considered in the category.  Chairman Parker indicated he did not care if a McDonald’s went in the Town Center District, and Secretary Lynch indicated it wouldn’t benefit the district.  Chairman Parker stated that the Planimetrics professional, Glenn Chandler, has stated through his professional research, town center districts prohibit drive-throughs.

 

Commissioner Amorossi left the room at 8:54 p.m.

 

ZEO Schappert reviewed the two decisions made at the last meeting.  One was that there was a majority decision that you did not want drive-throughs in the district, but eliminated them anywhere in Town.  He indicated that if you are making a distinction between the two types of drive-throughs, definitions are required.

 

Secretary Lynch indicated that if the Town wishes to have a New England type village, fast food facilities should be limited.   He proposed a regulation that allows for certain types of restaurants with drive-throughs.  Commissioner Mercer suggested going back to the way it was, to allow drive throughs in the parts that it was allowed and separately deal with drive-throughs in Four Corners.   Secretary Lynch agreed. 

 

Chairman Parker stated that a motion to rescind could be made by anyone at the meeting.  Selectman Lasser indicated it was his belief that a motion to rescind can be made by two-thirds majority or by a majority when it is published on the agenda.  Chairman Parker stated that he spoke with Town Counsel Neil Marcus, and he advised that if the person that made the original motion is present, that person has to make the motion to reconsider.  Selectman Lasser disagreed.  He suggested that it be included for the record that the consideration of rescinding the motion will take place at the next meeting.  After additional discussion, the Commission agreed that it needs to get back to the status of where it was before the last meeting regarding drive-throughs.

 

Commissioner Amorossi returned to the room at 9:00 p.m.

 

The Chairman reviewed the discussion that had occurred with Mr. Amorossi.

 

Selectman Lasser indicated that the motion to reconsider has to take place at the same meeting that the motion takes place.  He indicated that the Commission could repeal what was done, and it would take a two-thirds vote when it is not published that it will be reconsidered to add it to the agenda.  If the Commission waits until it is published, the rescinding could be done at next meeting with a majority vote.

 

Chairman Parker stated that Town Counsel indicated that whoever is present can make the motion to rescind if the person that made the original motion is not present. 

 

Commissioner Weisman moved that the Zoning Commission act to rescind the vote.  Chairman Parker and Secretary Lynch noted that it has to be a Motion to Reconsider.  Commissioner Weisman moved that the Zoning Commission reconsider the motion that where the vote was taken and passed on a 3-2 majority to restrict drive-through facilities.  The Commission members pointed out that this was the wrong motion.

 

Secretary Lynch moved to reconsider the previously proposed regulation amendment #201000439, Section 242-202, Definitions, Drive-through food and beverage facility.  Commissioner Amorossi seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously. 

 

Selectman Lasser pointed out that the original motion is now on the table. 

 

Secretary Lynch moved to rescind the proposed regulation amendment #201000439, Section 242-202, Definitions, Drive-through food and beverage facilities.  Commissioner Mercer inquired if the motion read only “drive-through facility”?  ZEO Schappert indicated that it included banks, pharmacies, and food service facilities.   Commissioner Mercer seconded the motion.  Commissioner Amorossi asked for the motion to be restated.  Chairman Parker stated that it was “to rescind proposed regulation amendment #201000439, Section 242-202, Definitions, Drive-through food and beverage facilities and restaurant.  The recording secretary asked if “restaurant” was included in the motion, and the Chairman Parker advised that it was.  Secretary Lynch explained that the Commission voted to reconsider, which passed unanimously, and now the Commission is considering a motion to rescind, the Definitions; and if it passes, then the status of the Commission returns to where it was at the beginning of the August 12, 2010 meeting.  Commissioner Weisman stated that the use issue still had to be dealt with.  Motion carried unanimously.

 

Commissioner Weisman moved that the Zoning Commission accept, as a permitted use, drive through facilities and drive through food and beverage facilities, in the IR80, IR80N, IRC80/40 and Town Center District.  ZEO Schappert pointed out that the definition no longer exists given the last motion.  Secretary Lynch indicated that the Commission must now redraft the regulation.  Commissioner Mercer indicated that the Commission must determine how it would handle drive through facilities in the area formerly known as Four Corners. 

 

9.   Comments of Commissioners         None.

 

10.    Adjourn

              Chairman Parker moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:12 p.m.  Secretary Lynch seconded the motion, and it carried unanimously.

 

 

                                  **Next Regular Meeting Scheduled for September 16, 2010**